Comments for Lex

Comment on The 377 verdict & the Kusum Ingots fairy tale by Tom

Tom — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:18 +0000

And this is the main reason I love lex.nationalinterest.in. Mavrelous post.

Comment on Light at the end of the tunnel to the SC ! by LINDSAYFanny

LINDSAYFanny — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:02:21 +0000

Lots of various persons understand techniques of research essay writing, but this does not mean they can write superior quality essays, but a essay writing service could aid to write the essay thesis of great quality and show writing skillfulness of some students.

Comment on ICL stands on a strong legal footing by achuikov

achuikov — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:04:42 +0000

I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
And you et an account on Twitter?

Comment on Govt’s attempts at seeking a reference to a larger bench a blessing in disguise ? by dating seeking

dating seeking — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:04:48 +0000

Nice post and great discussion going on here. Even though its an old one, its nice to read.

Comment on OBC Edu Reservations (minus creamy layer) to stay : SC (4:1) by maikee

maikee — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:22:14 +0000

you have great writting skills, no wonders, i will add you to my blogroll. Best of luck!

Comment on Not surprising indeed ! by andrey

andrey — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:46:41 +0000

good….

Comment on The 377 verdict & the Kusum Ingots fairy tale by Raunaq

Raunaq — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:42:35 +0000

http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.com/2009/07/justice-jsvermas-comment-on-naz.html

Comments of J.S. Verma J., makes a good reading this!

Comment on The 377 verdict & the Kusum Ingots fairy tale by Raunaq

Raunaq — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:22:40 +0000

Its gr8 that so many minds are working, if i may say “overtime”, to simplify the vexed question that the illustrious full bench of Khare J, Kapadia J and Sinha J created for us in Kusum Ingots.

As i see it the observation of Sinha J that “An order passed on writ petition questioning the constitutionality of a Parliamentary Act whether interim or final keeping in view the provisions contained in Cl. (2) of Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, will have effect throughout the territory of India subject of course to the applicability of the Act.” was an observation qualified by the previous statement “The Court must have the requisite territorial jurisdiction.”

What they meant to say was that any writ issued under 226 would be binding in so far as the person on whom it is sought to be enforced is amenable to the jurisdiction of such HC. It would be absurd to suggest that a HC could enforce a writ in a domain where there is an inherent lack of jurisdiction (which in our case is persons beyond the jurisdiction of the Del HC).

The decision in Naz Foundation has to be, in effect, perceived as a state amendment to CrPC making 377 non-cognizable.

Comment on The 377 verdict & the Kusum Ingots fairy tale by Raghu

Raghu — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:58:42 +0000

Compared to your previous posts this post has more lengthy and complex sentences making it difficult to read.

Flesch Reading Ease score of this post is 39.8 as per MS Word 2000.

Comment on India’s constitutional lab is boiling after all by India constitutional lab is boiling after all Lex | outdoor rugs

India constitutional lab is boiling after all Lex | outdoor rugs — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:20:34 +0000

[...] India constitutional lab is boiling after all Lex Posted by root 3 minutes ago (http://lex.nationalinterest.in) To increasing public awareness and education on strategic affairs content lex proudly powered by wordpress theme designed by the design canopy Discuss | Bury | News | India constitutional lab is boiling after all Lex [...]